|
While it may seem that the young Hopper might have been trying to pull a fast one (perhaps to win a middle-school art show), the truth is much less salacious. Although all but one of those early paintings are signed, it is possible that they never even left his attic, as that’s where Reverend Arthayer R. Sanborn found them after the artist had died. It was Sanborn who named several of the works, which cemented their connection to Hopper’s hometown.
Instead, it appears that Hopper used the color plates in Art Interchange as teaching tools. In fact, the magazine encouraged people to copy the works, and the plates were accompanied by instructions on how to do it. The ones for Lake View even said that the painting was “a very simple subject and well adapted to beginners.”
So, should this change our perception of Hopper? Juliana Roth, Chief Storyteller at the Edward Hopper House Museum & Study Center doesn’t think so. “This is a fascinating revelation, but one that does not reduce the importance of these paintings in the conversation of Hopper’s artistic journey,” she wrote. She suggests “viewing these paintings as artifacts from the development of a young life. A young artist’s life.”
She also added that “the myth of artistic genius is just that, a myth. No artist develops in a bubble, without influence, resource, or access…We believe it is essential to demystify the untouchable, unattainable notion of a master artist, and hope instead to inspire the belief in everyone to begin where they are, with whatever tools they have.”
|